000 | nam a22 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c86724 _d86724 |
||
008 | 190501b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
082 | _a570.07/Mou | ||
100 | _aMouton, Marnel | ||
245 | _aLegitimation code theory to facilitate transition from high school to first year biology | ||
300 | _a1-20p. | ||
520 | _aInstitutions of Higher Education have grappled with the predicament of first-year success and epistemological access for years. Recently, a study employed Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) to elucidate why students who performed relatively well in high school biology struggled with the subject in first-year. This study shed valuable light on this problem by revealing that the high school biology curriculum is at a completely different level to the university curriculum. In terms of LCT’s Semantics dimension, the high school curriculum displayed little movement from context dependent simpler meanings towards the relatively decontextualised complex meanings, frequently encountered in first-year biology. We argue that the Semantics dimension of LCT also offers a useful tool for restructuring first-year biology curricula to intentionally facilitate a more gradual transition for first-year students. Thus, by explicitly planning teaching activities to gradually increase the range between context dependent simpler meanings and relatively decontextualized complex meanings, the potential of cumulative learning can be optimised. This paper reflects on the process of revising a first-year biology curriculum to contribute to greater epistemological access and cumulative knowledge building. | ||
650 | _aArticulation Gap | ||
650 | _aLegitimation code theory | ||
650 | _aSemantics dimension | ||
650 | _aCumulative learning | ||
700 | _aArcher, Edward | ||
773 | 0 |
_dInstitute Of Biology _oS629 _tJournal of Biological Education, 53(1) Feb 2019 _x0021-9266 |
|
856 | _uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00219266.2017.1420681 | ||
942 | _cAR |